|
Post by Lindsay Rachow on Mar 9, 2016 20:51:39 GMT
o The message was not necessarily difficult to craft, but it did require me to be careful of what I was saying and how it would be perceived. Whenever discussing spending cuts, employees antenna’s start to raise. Employees can begin to panic and sense of anxiety can linger around the workplace. It’s important to be specific but mindful of the type of words/language being used. o The factor(s) I considered were things that were definite. I knew from the paragraph these definite things o There was a cut o The contract was being cut o People’s jobs will be adjusted This is what I focused on. The factor that people may be layed off was not a definite and I did not consider it being discussed in my message.
o The factors and questions that I considered about this message were the following o Who’s my audience o Does this effect everyone in the room o How much information should I share with the group
|
|
|
Post by Lorrie Lutz on Mar 10, 2016 11:25:01 GMT
Hi Lindsay--sometimes sticking to the facts in providing challenging messages is by far the most effective strategy. It is also really important to consider how much information is too much--and can actually exacerbate the situation. Good response.
|
|
|
Post by Diana Rhoads on Mar 10, 2016 14:08:42 GMT
Thinking about the audience is key. The CEO delivered a message to direct reports and so on and so. When it reached our level, I don't think the time to provide information that was too involved. I liked that you did not go into the layoffs as a focus.
|
|